ux 3 level ref table [parent]-[child]-[grandchild]

[bolognesiedalla]

Hi everyone I have 3 tables referenced to each other.

PIANI> can have many RIGHE PIANI> each RIGA PIANO can have many PRODOTTI

I would like to obtain in the detail view of PIANI (parent), the display of the many fields [DOSAGGIO] and [PRODOTTI] (grandchild), grouped by RIGA PIANO (child)

this is the maximum I managed to get by concatenating a list of values, but if I have too many PRODUCTS (grandchild) obviously they are hidden because the text string is too long.

Anyone have any advice for me?

this is an example of what I would like to achieve

[SkrOYC]

I mean you can show related records on deck views but in my experience those look very bad on the UI.

Check the “Nested table column” on the inline view config under deck view type

[bolognesiedalla]

Hello. My problem is that with the nested table I don’t see the names of the various products (because they are grandchild), but only the word “related products (3)”. Instead the end user must be able to have a complete view of the records as in the attached example.

[SkrOYC]

Screenshot please, because you should be able to see the records

[bolognesiedalla]

hello this is the inline (child) ROWS PLANS view and it actually looks as I would like (except for the white space)

Unfortunately it is not reported in the Plans Detail views (parent). Is there any way to enter it?

… I’m sorry but maybe I’m getting confused …

[SkrOYC]

Seems like it’s properly configured so I’d say it’s not possible to do it easily without some workaround.

@Steve Any ideas?

[Steve]

Nested tables were never fully implemented and are not well supported. I have no experience with them. I advise against using them.