That’s an important perspective — but it also raises a critical question.
What happens when AI itself becomes part of the problem?
In our experience, AI is not only reshaping defenses but also inadvertently creating new pathways for disruption and exposure. While AI enables speed and scale in protecting environments, it can also amplify mistakes or introduce vulnerabilities that ripple far wider than anticipated.
It feels like we’re at a tipping point where AI is both the shield and, at times, the sword — with consequences that can be just as disruptive as the threats it’s meant to mitigate.
I’d be very interested to hear how CrowdStrike and others in the industry are thinking about these dual-use risks.