Map view - Minimum Cluster Size

AppSheet AppSheet Q&A
1

Hi,

I use the map view with the view option “Minimum Cluster Size”.

In my app this option is set to 3 and this is in use since several years.

Actually I find this option not working as expected anymore. If I click on the number, it zooms in, but the number does not change. If I zoom in the number does never disappear.

Does someone else has this problem?

Christoph

2

Googlemap api call reduction probably. I did some research on this recently and it is a google map api thing when i wanted custom clustering in my app that i am migrating. My assumption is cost cutting… hopefully just a hiccup

3

I also saw this change in behaviour.
I guess the clusterization was some of the past of AppSheet BG (beforeGoogle) until it started being managed by maps API.

4

@Jose_Arteaga , could you ask about this?

5

Thanks @Steve,

@chris60, first of all welcome back! are you still experiencing this issue? I am still asking about this but as @ktsmediaprod suggests, it might have been just a hiccup.

6

Thanks @Jose_Arteaga for checking. Yes, it still looks very strange and not stable. Maybe you want to take a look at my app: (PII Removed by Staff)

7

Ok, I will send you a PM

8

Updates on this? I just duplicated the topic

9

No update yet.

@Jose_Arteaga do you expect something from me actually?

10

Hello @chris60,

Could you check again please?

11

Hi @Jose_Arteaga

thanks for coming back to me. Unfortunately the situation remains as strange as before.

Example: I have a region with 5 points, clustered with a 5. That is ok.

If I zoom the region, I can see 4 points plus 1 point with an attached point with a number 5. This number 5 never disappears and nothing happens when clicking on this 5. Maybe this is intentional? But for me it is confusing because I never know how many points are now shown and how many are clustered.

If I zoom then in and out it happens that a second clustered number appears, so the total number of points is totally wrong now. I guess this behaviour can be simulated very easily.

Thanks

Christoph

12

Thanks, I’ll continue following up.

13

@Jose_Arteaga @chris60 Was this resolved?

14

Hi @Steve ,

unfortunately the issue has not been resolved yet. The behavior still looks very strange.

@Jose_Arteaga will follow up.

Best

Christoph

15

Thanks @chris60,

I just checked again and pero the notes it was fixed already, could you send screenshots or perhaps a video of the problem?

16

Hello @Jose_Arteaga , hello @Steve ,

good news, the issue has been solved now. One week ago it was still an issue, but now resolved finally.

Thanks for information.

With best regards

Christoph