GCP Integration with Dynatrace

Google Cloud Data Analytics
,
1

I would like to integrate GCP with Dynatrace monitoring service to analyze the logs and metrics from gcp. For this usecase, I think to use a GKE auto pilot cluster to forward the logs from gcp to dynatrace. Is there a helpful references with example on this usecase would be helpful?

2

I suggest reaching out to Dynatrace for customer use cases and referrals. For your reference here are some helpful links I found:

1 Like
3

Thanks for your prompt reply. As per the Dynatrace documentation, it’s recommended to use a GKE auto pilot cluster (with Linux image). But based on which factors, do we need to make a call to use a GKE auto pilot or a GKE standard cluster for integration with Dynatrace ? Any thoughts on this apart of cost efficiency?

Dg03cloud_0-1710796315654.png
Dg03cloud_0-1710796315654.png1290Ă—1420 113 KB

4

Here some considerations that influence the choice between GKE Autopilot and GKE Standard for Dynatrace integration:

  • Management and Control:

    • GKE Autopilot: Google manages the underlying infrastructure (nodes, etc.), handles node-level operations, scaling, and upgrades. You have less control over the low-level details of your cluster.
    • GKE Standard: You get full administrative control over the cluster’s nodes, allowing extensive customization of the Kubernetes environment.

  • Operational Simplicity:

    • GKE Autopilot: Ideal if you want the easiest setup and maintenance. Autopilot automates tasks, making it a great choice if your team doesn’t need in-depth Kubernetes expertise.
    • GKE Standard: Requires your team to have stronger Kubernetes knowledge for management and troubleshooting.

  • Workload Requirements:

    • GKE Autopilot: May have limitations depending on specific workload needs. Thoroughly assess if Autopilot supports all features required by your applications.
    • GKE Standard: Provides greater flexibility to tailor the cluster to any workload due to granular control.

  • Customization:

    • GKE Autopilot: Limited customization options as Google manages much of the infrastructure.
    • GKE Standard: Full flexibility to customize node configurations, network settings, etc.

  • Cost Efficiency:

    • GKE Autopilot: Pay-per-pod pricing model, potentially more cost-effective for well-defined workloads.
    • GKE Standard: Cost calculated based on node resources. Consider this if you need predictable costs or have workloads sensitive to node-level changes.

When GKE Autopilot might be a good fit:

  • You prioritize operational simplicity and managed infrastructure.
  • Your team focuses on application development rather than deep Kubernetes management.
  • Your workloads fit well within GKE Autopilot’s capabilities.
  • You can benefit from the pay-per-pod cost structure.

When GKE Standard might be more suitable:

  • You require fine-grained control over nodes, networking, or the Kubernetes environment.
  • You have specialized workloads that need a highly customized cluster setup.
  • Your team has strong Kubernetes expertise and can handle advanced cluster management.
  • You prefer the predictable cost structure based on node resources.

Beyond Cost Efficiency:

While cost is important, the decision depends heavily on your team’s skillset, your management preferences, and your workload’s specific requirements.

If you’re unsure, start with a GKE Autopilot cluster for its simplicity. If you later encounter limitations or the need for advanced customization, a transition to GKE Standard is possible.

1 Like